Horizontal Displacement
Bulb-Outs, Neck-Downs, Mid-Block Crossings

Neck-downs, bulb-outs, chokers, and mid-block crossings are physical devices placed in the roadway to create horizontal deflections by narrowing points along the roadway.

Neck-downs, bulb-outs, chokers, and mid-block crossings are physical devices placed in the roadway to create horizontal deflections by narrowing points along the roadway. Drivers are forced to slow to negotiate the narrowed points on the roadway.

When applied on a two-lane road (each direction), these techniques can be used to narrow the lanes and slow traffic or to reduce the two lanes to one.

Narrowing of the main road section is referred to as a "choke" or "mid-block crossing" (when refuge and pavement markings are added). Narrowing at an intersection is referred to as a "neck-down" or "bulb-out."

Advantages

  • Shortens pedestrian crossing distances
  • Leads to tighter turning radii and forces turning vehicles to slow

Disadvantages

  • Interrupts drainage patterns at intersections and mid-block, which adds to the cost of implementation
  • May be difficult for large or oversized vehicles, such as farm equipment, to negotiate

Effectiveness

An Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) study indicates that narrowing results in a 2.6 miles per hour (mph) speed reduction (Ewing 1999).

No crash modification factors (CMFs) were found relating to neck-downs, bulb-outs, chokers, or mid-block crossings.

Appropriateness

Devices used to narrow lanes physically should be used with caution for the types and amounts of traffic on primary roadways through small communities. Use of neck-downs, bulb-outs, chokers, and mid-block crossings may not be appropriate with heavy truck traffic and/or large farm equipment.

Cost

The uses of bulb-outs, neck-downs, chokers, and mid-block crossing have a very high cost if designing them into the roadway. A cheaper alternative is paint markings, which may have a lower effectiveness.

References

City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina. "Traffic Calming Policy. Section IV." Traffic Calming Measures, 2003.

Ewing, Reid. Traffic Calming: State of the Practice. Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1999.

Image: Aerial view of bulb-outs at four-way intersection

Aerial view of bulb-outs (City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina 2003)


Development of this website was financed in part through funds provided by the Iowa Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration state planning and research funding.

The contents of this website reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this website are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the sponsors.

The sponsors assume no liability for the contents or use of the information contained in this website. This website does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

The sponsors do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers' names appear on this website only because they are considered essential to the website's objective.